Wednesday, 7 May 2008
Let's Fight: Response to Ellee
Ellee asked in a reply to an earlier post if we had taken up the issue with our MP. My reply to her was so lengthy that I decided to make it into a complete post.
We have involved our MSP since health is devolved to the Scottish Parliament.
An abbreviated timeline is shown below but fuller details can be seen here.
"On 5th July 2007 our MSP wrote a detailed letter to the Chief Executive of NHS Lothian.
On 19th August 2007 NHS Lothian replied but did not address any of the questions / major points raised but rather questioned some of the background information included by our MSP.
On 21st September 2007, our MSP wrote again.
On 21st November 2007, our MSP wrote once more chasing a reply.
During January 2008 our MSP's office phoned repeatedly but in their words, "We were given the run around."
On the 25th January 2008, NHS Lothian told the MSP's office that they would have a letter issued by early the next week."
On 25th March a reply - again unsatisfactory - was received.
We waited more than 6 MONTHS for a reply to our MSP's second letter.
We waited more than 8 MONTHS for answers to the issues raised in the MSP's first letter and have not yet received them.
There is no doubt in my mind that NHS Lothian has deliberately delayed its response and deliberately refused to answer the key questions but this begs the question, "Why on earth should they behave in this way?"
The only explanation which makes sense to me is that NHS Lothian believes that many (or all) of Mrs Carr's symptoms are escalating behaviours to get further treatment. A common method of dealing with such patients is to ignore them on the basis that to give credence to the symptoms only encourages the person to make more demands. This would explain why no-one has offered us an explanation either for her symptoms or her lack of treatment.
There is more evidence for the view that Mrs Carr's symptoms are not taken seriously. I found, on the web, that the NHS uses a particular self-reporting questionnaire for assessing depression levels in patients (PHQ-9). Twice Mrs Carr completed this form at home: once I gave a completed copy to Mrs Carr's GP and once to a hospital psychiatrist after a suicide attempt. Mrs Carr scored 23 and 25 (out of 27) respectively which is indicative of severe depression. On neither occasion was any interest shown in the results nor was any action taken. Interestingly, a few months later when I visited the same GP because I felt really down she gave me the PHQ-9 form to complete. Therefore, the form was worthy for me to complete but irrelevant for Mrs Carr's treatment despite the very high scores.
If the NHS believes Mrs Carr is escalating her behaviours, then she is still very ill and deserves to know her diagnosis and prognosis and to have treatment.
If the NHS is wrong, as I believe them to be, then Mrs Carr desperately needs the correct diagnosis and treatment but ....... since they won't talk to us we cannot accept nor reject their views and cannot get get a referral to an appropriate assessment and treatment centre.
I have spoken to 5 national treatment centres and all have said that Mrs Carr is the type of patient they should see but we can't access them. On the basis of two self-reporting questionnaires one centre said that Mrs Carr scored highly for the relevant disorders and should have a full assessment. This has been denied to Mrs Carr by NHS Lothian.
I should make clear that I am not taking the line that Mrs Carr has Disorder Z and that I won't rest until she is diagnosed with it. Her history and symptoms fit with Disorder Z; national experts believe she should be assessed for this disorder but NHS Lothian remains silent on their diagnosis and reasons. Until NHS Lothian is open and honest with us I will not rest. This is all I ever wanted; openness, honesty, trust in clinicians so that Mrs Carr has an opportunity to improve. What we have encountered is coldness, closedness, callousness, obfuscation, delay and a refusal to engage in any serious discussion of Mrs Carr's problems.
The minimum NHS Lothian should do is tell us the truth. Then we can either accept their version or fight it but by refusing to engage with us (or our MSP) they leave us struggling in a vacuum. How can we accept a diagnosis if no-one tells us what is the diagnosis? How do we challenge a diagnosis if no-one tells us what is the diagnosis. How do we fight for assessment if no-one tells us why they won't make a referral?
Even worse by not engaging with us Mrs Carr has been left ill and, apparently, unwanted, for an additional year with no likelihood of effective assessment or treatment and the rest of the family has been left with the stress of caring for Mrs Carr and of seeing her continue to suffer unnecessarily.
Also the trust which Mrs Carr should have in the NHS has been destroyed. How can she be expected to trust clinicians in the future when she has been treated so badly?
Let me say again, all I ever wanted was openness, honesty, truth and trust in clinicians so that Mrs Carr has an opportunity to improve but what we have encountered is coldness, closedness, callousness, obfuscation, delay and a refusal to engage in any serious discussion of Mrs Carr's problems.
The system has closed ranks against us.
The system is killing Mrs Carr.
Fight: I have no option.
Please help me.
Please help Mrs Carr.
Together we have a chance to force NHS Lothian to speak to us honestly and to view Mrs Carr as being ill and worthy of urgent treatment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
It seems such an unbelievable story Calum, so frustrating for you but not only that it must make you very angry.
I put up a post tonight linking to yours.
As always you have my support and good wishes for your quest.
I'm so sorry too, it is a very heartbreaking situation.
I feel very much for you, having been at the receiving end of some absolutely appalling behaviour myself. I've also known a number of other people having been treated the same way.
The problem is not so much the NHS, but the 'profession' as a whole, as abuse takes place in the private sector just as much if not more.
Unfortunately, this refusal to address problems and mistakes appears to be drummed into them at University where they tend to be told that if mistakes occur, it's always the patients fault because the psychologists believe that they are so good at their jobs they can never err. I actually heard a consultant psychiatrist state this as a fact. Either he was an idiot, or he assumed I was. The exact quote is:
"psychologists are professionally trained to never make mistakes, therefore they never make them." Wondering whether I should have immediately set up a church and altar to these people who clearly believe themselves to be gods, I politely made my excuses and left. This simply cannot be the case.
The other problem is that with psychology being one of the easiest degree courses you can do, it attracts those who are, to put it politely, not as clever as they like to think they are. With that calibre of people pratctising this type of treatment it's hardly surprising that so much can and does go horribly wrong.
Psychology is not a science, it is a skill, pretty much an innate one as I have learned from some of the wonderful people I have known but that have no qualifications in psychology. Until this issue is addressed problems will continue.
I really support you in your quest for justice and fair, compassionate treatment for Mrs Carr, and hope that you achieve it.
I'm providing a link to a website which you might find helpful. Tha is, if you haven't already been directed to it.
They weren't able to help me as at the time they only dealt with problems in private care. However, I believe that they now also assist those whose problems stem from the NHS as well.
WITNESS
jmb: Thanks for your comments - again. I know!! And I appreciate hugely!!
Ellee Thank YOU!!!
ginro Thanks for your support but I'm sorry to hear that you too suffered.
I'll check out the link - thanks.
Psychologists!! - well, I have little positive to say about any clinician
I think Mrs. Carr has a wonderful champion in her corner.
How can we help?
Open to suggestions and adding my two cents.
Have you gone to the news about this to get media attention?
Would a lawyer not be a wise course of action?
I think this is disgraceful but typical in the U.K.
When my GRandfather went into acare home and was given appalling treatment, including psychical assault which left him wiht a need for 5 stitches( he was 90) he was intimidated into changing his story.
When I demanded a full investigation ( I was given 5 versions as to how he injured HIMSELF and WHEN thye discovered this) I was made to feel like an interferer and basically told ot mind my own business.
Naturally, I did NOT, but the nursing homes in the UK are equally a disgrace, with social services backing up homes to keep up appearances and it's always the family who create problems.
We were treated like unwelcome guests when we visited( and had to do his personal care ourselves) and criminals in general, which only his death alleviated us from.
I would NEVER put an aged relation in a care home in the UK again.
I really feel for your wife.
Look at the assualt victim , who had sustained injuries, and reacted aggressively (a symptom of head injury) who was kicked out of A& E, tried to get back in for treatment, had the police called on him and then died in their care.
He was in his 20's.
Uber
Thanks for the comment and the suggestions.
I'm trying to get our message as widely spread in the blogging world. What I am hoping is that this web campaign takes off to the point where it becomes the news. Once several within MSM involved then much harder for NHS to stay silent. I know that this is a very long shot.
If less successful than this there is the chance that the story will still be picked up on.
Our MSP has been unsuccessful in getting any answers ex the NHS. In fact took 6 months to reply to her second letter.
I've been in contact with a local journalist but I'm not convinced that his angle would have been partic helpful - but this option is open.
An experienceed counsellor - not Mrs C's - suggested that we might have a case against the health board for a failure in their duty of care. I haven't investigated this yet.
I wrote elsewhere today - I can't remember where - that there is a risk that I focus too much on this web campaign. I need to be careful.
We have the option of approaching the Scottish press and/or TV and radio.
A widely read blogger has invited me to write a guest post and has offered to ask one of the biggest UK political bloggers to link to that post. Have still to write this psot and so prob middle of next week. This does offer my best chance to date of really breaking into the big time.
What can you do? Anything at all which spreads my campaign or even keeps it bubbling.
Finally, thanks for visiting and for the interest. Every visit and every comment is a bonus.
Calum: I have been going through approximately a year of hell with my health here in the USA. Started last spring and my health just kept deteriorating and no medical doctor could seem to find a problem or cared to. But I was lucky. EVENTUALLY, and much money spent later, we found a rheumatologist who was willing and able to help. I am doing well. And when doctors looked at me like I was crazy, my husband kept saying, "her pain is real." My husband is a clinical psychologist. Thank heavens he understood that something was going on physically that needed to be healed. And, he understood and still does that my emotions were taking a beating as well. But, we had to fight the system the whole way. Many prayers and best of luck to you and your wife. Don't give up.
Donnetta
Donetta
Why do we all have to end up fighting the bloody system?
Thanks for your best wishes.
Also giving up is not allowed.
I've only just discovered your blog (via The Rollercoaster of Life) so haven't had much of a chance to read the whole story. I'll read more and then be able (hopefully) to post more at a later date.
However PHQ-9s are something I DO know about. You said "the form was worthy for me to complete but irrelevant for Mrs Carr's treatment despite the very high scores" - the trouble is that the points system for the assessment of quality of GPs servces (the Quality and Outcomes Framework - or QoF for short) rewards GPs for filling out the forms, not for actually doing anything with the results.
Marcella: That's interesting about GP rating but that GPs might not bother about using the info: that's just cynical! How could you? :-)
Will pop by
Post a Comment