You posted about Oprah Winfrey on Friday - as shown below
Your link takes readers here at tmz.com (also see immediately below).
There is no mention here of Palin's whiteness being involved in a decision not to interview her before the election.
This tmz page links to The Drudge Report here (and also below)
There is no mention in The Drudge Report about colour being the reason for Oprah not interviewing Palin now.
I, therefore, commented as shown below, a comment which you show but do not answer.
I ask again.
Given that neither your post nor your links contain any evidence for colour being at the heart of Oprah's decision not to interview Palin now, why do you assert this to be the case?
Why do you:
- title your post "Too white for Oprah"
- state in the body of your post "Sarah Palin's too white to be interviewed on your show"
- include "racism" as a label
- include "hypocrisy" as a label?
Come on, Donal , you're not normally slow in saying what you think.
What is your evidence, Donal?
If you have evidence, please display it now.
If you have no evidence then you should delete your post immediately and post an apology to Oprah Winfrey.
What is it to be, Donal? Evidence or apology?